At one point, Smith and DQ are reading a newspaper, previously used
as a diaper. Feces fills the middle of the screen, in full-on
scatological glory, so we have to look beyond it to read the text the
characters are reading. I can’t believe I’m writing this, but it
would have been so much more clever (and less painfully obvious) to
have the feces slightly off center. But “subtle” is not a word in
Davis’ script.
If you can sidestep the fetid stains, there are plenty of good
moments to appease the adrenaline junkie. The action is inventive,
including a scene where Smith shoots a carousel to spin it around,
preventing Hertz from getting a clear shot at the baby.
In fact, this film is an exercise in seeing how many ways to fit a
gun fight fit into a movie. (11, actually.) Then there’s the sex
scene. Let’s just say that the producers would have had trouble
finding an American actress as willing as Belucci.
I don’t know what kind of Satanic covenant Davis signed in order to
secure the talents of Belucci, Giamatti, and Owen, but Lucifer
brought light to the casting gods that week. Even though Shoot 'Em Up
lacks character development, these pros know how to make the most of
the material. Because of this, both Giamatti’s and Owen’s
characters
are entertaining and watchable.
But most importantly, the characters are thinking people. They work
the problems and make logical conclusions. How many times in cinema
history have characters stumbled into each other because it was
convenient for the story? Here, Hertz never just turns up; he uses
logic to locate Smith. And while Hertz predicts Smith’s next moves,
Smith is deciphering the origins of the hunted infant.
And that’s what I disliked the most about this movie: it could have
been so much better than it was. One may argue that some movies are
meant to be enjoyed for the sake of dumb fun. But I argue that a
movie that flaunts its lack of intelligence with attention-grabbing
stunts is just as manipulative as a made-for-TV, disease-of-the-week
tear-jerker.
The fact is, I am the audience for this movie. I adore action films,
B-movies, Hong Kong chop-sockys. I like it when constraints of budget
and logistics forces the writer, director, and crew to use their
imaginations. Perhaps the $37 million price tag was just too much
money for Davis and Co.
I have to come back to the fact that the movie is called Shoot ‘Em
Up, a two-and-a-half word promise that the director delivers. Still,
it didn’t work for me. Shoot 'Em Up is not a dumb movie that never
had a chance to be smart. It’s a movie that had the chance to be
smart but chose not to take it.